Missoulian Article Admits Wolves Kill Few Livestock…So Why No Love For Wolves?

 

A recent Missoulian article stated:

“Wolf attacks account for only a small fraction of sheep and cattle losses in the Northern Rockies. Disease, weather and coyotes each take more”

You would think that would be the title of the article,  instead it was:

“Gray wolves killed 1 stock animal per day in 2009, depleting compensation program”

So after admitting wolf kills were responsible for a tiny fraction of livestock deaths. the article went on to say,

“But wolves attract particular disdain because of their viciousness – many killed animals are left uneaten – and because of historic prohibitions against hunting the predators.”

First, I take strong issue with wolves being termed vicious, a predator’s job is to kill and survive. Look at the ugly pictures on FB and the Internet of grinning hunters with the bloodied, battered, beheaded bodies of wolves they’ve killed with high-powered rifles, to find out which predator enjoys killing!!  They look like they’ve just won the lottery instead of taking the life of a beautiful animal for no reason other than blood lust.

Read Predatory Bureaucracy, The Extermination of Wolves and the Transformation of the West, by Michael Robinson, if you want to learn about the viciousness of man toward the wolf.

Secondly, was the reference to wolves leaving prey uneaten directed at the Dillon sheep  incident?  That story has been sensationalized and beaten into the ground. In my opinion, all the facts are not known and may never be known concerning Dillon but some of the answers may be explained here:

Sheep and cattle, unlike their wild ungulate cousins, lack any kind of defense against wolf attacks. This mismatch can lead to the occasional slaughter, raising outcries from Western ranchers who demand greater measures to prevent wolf attacks. However, wolves only turn to livestock when their natural prey is unavailable, so these killings are infrequent. In 2008, wolves are known to have killed fewer than 200 cattle and sheep in Montana, and 100 wolves were hunted down in response.

Dogs are the only animal that definitely kills for sport, but that’s only because humans taught them to do so. When a farmer finds a few dead chickens killed during the daylight hours with no missing body parts, the neighbor’s dog is almost always the culprit.”

The Missoulian article goes on to say there is disdain for the wolf because of :

“historic prohibitions against hunting the predators”

What?  So people hate wolves because they weren’t allowed to legally kill them?  Who is the one that enjoys killing again?

Wildlife Services blows wolves away every year for agribusiness.

The SSS crowd has been in full force. There may not have been a legal wolf hunt until now but there’s been plenty of wolf killing since their reintroduction. All we have to do is look to the past to see what the future could hold for wolves.  They were exterminated in the West by the federal government working hand in hand with ranchers. The state of Montana introduced sarcoptic mange into the wolf population in the early 1900’s to get rid of wolves. The reason wolves made it back from the brink  is because of the Endangered Species Act, passed in the 1970’s.  The protection of ESA was the single most important factor in wolf recovery. It will be their downfall if their ESA protections are not reinstated.  Wolves need help and they need good press, not constant reporting of minimal livestock depredations. Or to be fair let’s have media coverage of every cow that’s stolen or dies giving birth.  Sound ridiculous?  It is.  Just as the wolf coverage has been ridiculous and unfair.

Since wolves kill so few livestock, why does the media continue to report wolf depredations like its big news?  What’s behind this obsession?  It only feeds into myths and stereotypes about wolves. Lets look at the facts:

“The governments own figures again show that mammalian carnivores kill very few livestock (0.18%)  Of the 104.5 million cattle that were produced in 2005, 190,000 (or 0.18%) died as the result of predation from coyotes, domestic dogs, and other carnivores (USDA, 2006). In comparison, livestock producers lost 3.9 million head of cattle (3.69%) to all sorts of maladies, weather, or theft, respiratory problems, digestive problems, calving, unknown, other, disease, lameness, metabolic problems, poison (USDA, 2006)

Coyotes were the primary cattle predators — they killed 97,000 cattle in 2005, followed by domestic dogs — which killed 21,900 cattle. Wolves killed remarkably few cattle, 4,400 head, as did the felids (USDA, 2006)”

Yet the drumbeat of media coverage on wolf  kills seems to have no end. Here’s a tiny sampling of headlines from different news outlets. From the headlines it looks as if wolves are on a livestock killing spree. That is simply not true,  as the Missoulian article admits.

========

Kill order placed on Ore. wolves killing livestock

September 01, 2009

======

Wildlife agencies kill 19 wolves in three days

Wolves Killed as Tensions Rise

12-17-08

======

Wolf Pack Killed near McCall, Idaho

July 22, 2004

=======

Idaho’s Whitehawk wolf pack killed

September 01, 2009

=======

Feds OK killing of wolf pack

March 5, 2004

=======

Feds kill 7 wolves in Stanley Basin

December 5, 2009

========

I’d like to see the numbers of cattle and sheep losses from other causes, specifically disease, weather, theft, reproductive issues even altitude sickness.  It will show the majority of cattle die from causes unrelated to predation, over ninety percent. So why no love for the wolf, when wolves show remarkable restraint when it comes to livestock?  Why aren’t ranchers complaining about livestock losses from other causes?

Well for one thing, ranchers aren’t compensated for losing cows or sheep to lightning.  That’s why I don’t believe ranchers should be compensated for wolf kills.  They aren’t reimbursed for coyote kills or losses from calving or disease. When you’re in business there is no guarantee against risk, if there were, every business person in the country would be eligible for handouts.

The idea behind paying ranchers for miniscule wolf kills is thought to increase their tolerance of wolves. Well, how’s that policy working out?  Not very well because paying ranchers for wolf kills only gives them a vested interest in reporting them.  It also increases scrutiny of wolves.  We have entire state and federal programs dedicated to hounding wolves as if they’re deadly criminals or terrorists.  They are darted, collared, tracked, trapped and gunned from helicopters.  All a wolf has to do is look at a cow sideways and ranchers will be on the phone to the state game agencies, looking for a kill permit (shoot on sight) or getting Wildlife Services involved to kill wolves, sometimes entire packs. This is happening now in Montana with kill orders out on the Miner’s Lake Pack, The Battlefield Pack, The Mitchell Mountain Pack, The Elevation Pack and Horse Prairie Pack.

500 wolves died in the Northern Rockies in 2009 and almost 300 of them were killed for livestock depredation.  Eight Montana wolves have already been killed for livestock in 2010 and the new year is barely over two  weeks old.

Making wolves out to be the bad guys is an old tactic that’s worked for hundreds of years. It caused their extermination in the West the first time. Wolves are predators, just like the grizzly or mountain lion. It doesn’t make them bad. It doesn’t make them vicious. Wolf kills provide food for other predators and scavengers, especially in winter. Grizzlies feed on wolf kills, so do coyotes, foxes, ravens and eagles. Wolves provide for others by providing for themselves.

Wolves also influence their surroundings in a positive way. After they were exterminated in a vicious- campaign in the West, elk and other ungulates over-browsed the landscape, stunting willow and ash. The trees could never make it past a few feet before they were grazed down. Years after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone in 1995, scientists discovered something amazing. The ash and willow trees rebounded. The elk were no longer standing around browsing, they were on high alert, With the ash came the beaver, songbirds and other animals. It was a rebirth. All because the wolf came home to Yellowstone.

I’d like to see more positive articles about wolves. They have many altruistic qualities people could aspire to. They mate for life, they live in large close families, they have tight social bonds, they show an exuberance for life, they have a unique playfulness, a healthy wolf rarely attacks people. Aside from those admirable qualities wolves are also smart, smarter than dogs. A dog’s brain is 30% smaller than a wolf. Wolves solve problems, they cooperate with each other, there is order in the pack.

Wolves are the super stars in Yellowstone, even though for the first time since their reintroduction,  their population is in decline, down 33 percent.  The wolf hunt had something to do with that, since Montana opened the hunting season right outside Yellowstone’s boundary. which decimated the famous, studied Cottonwood Pack.  Still people come from all over the world to view Yellowstone wolves, which brings in 35 million annually to the GYA.  If the states would think outside the box, they’d be  promoting wolf viewing in the Northern Rockies, which has the potential to be a huge money-maker, if Yellowstone is an indicator.  Instead they’re killing them. How short-sighted and tragic.

I challenge Western media to stop sensationalizing wolf kills. It serves no purpose but to inflame passions and cause wolves to be demonized more than they already have been.  It’s a fact, “wolf attacks account for only a small fraction of sheep and cattle losses in the Northern Rockies” By concentrating on cows and sheep it shifts the focus away from wolves welfare to wolves elimination.

If more people cared for their families the way wolves do, it would be a better world.  Show some love for wolves!

Posted in:  Wolf Wars, wolf intolerance

Tags:  wolves in the crossfire, wolf myths, trophy hunting wolves, Wildlife Services

About these ads
Published in: on January 19, 2010 at 1:31 am  Comments (25)  
Tags: ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2010/01/19/missoulian-article-admits-wolves-kill-few-livestock-so-why-no-love-for-wolves/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

25 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. Great article, Nabeki! You made some strong points there. Especially about the need of positive articles about wolves, the fact that they kill a very small percent of farm animals (which is exactly the same here in Sweden), and that if government thought outside the box for just a moment, they would see the financial benefits of having wovles prosper, via tourism.

    It is exactly the same over here, and I believe in other countries as well. All just driven by hate, cause by not having the right to kill predators, who were protected for so long, by the need for trophies, and the overal ingnorance and lack of knowledge.

    • Thanks Katerina….I’m always amazed that wolves get such bad coverage in the press when they do so little harm to agribusiness. It’s all political. The ranchers know wolves kill very few livestock. They know how many cows and sheep they lose to causes other then wolves. I hate to malign the little coyote but they do far more damage to cattle and even that is a mere fraction. This is just a campaign against wolves to demonize them. I’m tired of reading about every livestock kill, if the media is going to do that I want them to cover every dead cow and sheep that dies from lightening or disease. Fair is fair.

      It’s amazing that some of the attitudes in Sweden are the same here. As I said wolf persecution is global. Actually European settlers brought their wolf hatred with them. Many Native American tribes revered the wolf and called him brother. Sad what has happened to the wolf but we have to keep speaking out for the voiceless.

      For the wild ones, For the wolves,
      Nabeki

  2. Looks like there’s another little complaint for the pro-wolf-hunting side. Here it is: Prior to wolf reintroduction, hunters could enjoy hunting elk because of the high number. Now that wolves have returned (and have done their indented job), hunters have to actually LOOK for elk and do a lot more leg work and have diminished chances of making a kill.

    Let me get my violin.

    • John d.,I’ll join you with my violin.

      • A violin playing “hearts and flowers”……

    • “Looks like there’s another little complaint for the pro-wolf-hunting side. Here it is: Prior to wolf reintroduction, hunters could enjoy hunting elk because of the high number. Now that wolves have returned (and have done their indented job), hunters have to actually LOOK for elk and do a lot more leg work and have diminished chances of making a kill.”

      I thought that hunting was about LOOKING for the animal plus do lots of leg work.
      I’ll get my cello…

      • And I will get my violin.

      • And we can all play “hearts and flowers” for them Rita.

        N.

  3. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by OnyxWolf and Sharla Stone, Nabeki. Nabeki said: Missoulian Article Admits Wolves Kill Few Livestock…So Why No Love For Wolves?: http://wp.me/pDTDG-YD [...]

  4. DEAR NABEKI! THOUSANDS THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPER GREAT ARTICLE! ALL WHAT YOU WROTE IT’S A TRUTH….DON’T FORGET,PLEASE,I’M WITH YOU…I’M FOLLOWING YOU! GOD BLESSING ALL WOLVES ON THIS SO BAD WORLD!

    • Your welcome Agnes. Just trying to get the truth out there so people are aware of what’s going on here in the Northern Rockies.

      N.

  5. Excellent article! I, being a Wildlife Biologist on carnivore behavior, have lots to say, but my mind right now is running around with all the information, and it is almost midnight here right now. But, I am sure you are ALL intelligent on Wolves in general, so I won’t bore you with any similar knowledge. Again! Thanks for the article, and thanks for all that support wildlife.

    • Hello Phil,
      I missed your comment somehow. Welcome!! I would love if you’d share your knowledge on carnivore behavior, especially from a biologist who is a wolf advocate. They are so hard to come by these days. I have a love for carnivores. They are the engine that drives evolution.

      Thanks for stopping by and I hope you are a regular visitor.

      For the wolves, For the wild ones,
      Nabeki

  6. I couldn’t help, but post this. Some extremely cowardly hunter shot a black bear in its den.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/16/black-bear-killed-by-hunt_n_797966.html

    • Sigh…..

      N.

  7. you all are a bunch of morons, if you would actually get off your couch and come to the rockies you would see whats going on, the wolves are taking out elk herds like they are flies, they kill for the joy of killing and they dont eat but a quarter of the meat. you guys argue for a cause that you really know nothing about!!!!!

    • Gee John- it’s so nice to have an expert like you to tell us what’s really going on! Humans not wolves kill for the joy of killing. Elk herds in all but a few places are doing fine. It does mean John that you can’t shoot animals from your pickup, you may have to look for an animal. Hunting is so much work isn’t it. Doing it properly that is

      • Sorry guys, apparently John slipped though the comments today, otherwise he would never have been approved. But I’ll leave it up to remind everyone the mindset we’re dealing with. These comments are almost all exactly alike. Rude and and ignorant. As if the only people that live in the Northern Rockies think like this. That’s why I have a spam filter. Goodbye John…don’t let the door hit you on the way out..

      • As William said, elk are doing fine. In some areas they are down, that could be from a # of things or maybe the elk just moved elsewhere which is very possible given the fact they have changed their behavior and started acting more like elk after wolves were reintroduced. It is perfectly natural for elk #s to be down in some places as predators need food to survive. This is perfectly natural.

      • How does anyone count elk,or anything else,accurately from a airplane or helicopter? Counts could be off;to high one year,to low the next.I have white-tail deer where I live and in some years you can see them in my backyard looking for food or trying to go from one field to the other in search for food,but in other years, they are nowhere to be seen. They,as any other creature,are just trying to find food.

    • John,You are the one that doesn’t know anything about wildlife,maybe some hunters know about wild life but,apparently,you are not one of them.Elk numbers have many causes that make their numbers low.I be more worried about the wild places that the elk could live on besides cows,which trample down the earth and the ranchers fearing any other wildlife could transmitting diseases to their cows.

    • Why is it that these idiots think that wolf kills go to waste? they don’t. Even if wolves don’t eat their kills when most of the time they do, other animals in the ecosystem get a free and easy meal because of the wolves. Do human hunters do that? provide food to other animals in the ecosystem? no!!!! I also think it’s hypocritical and disgusting for hunters to claim wolves kill for sport when infact human hunters are the ones that truly kill for sport.

  8. This year is going to be a bumpy road for the wolves and for those who love them.The war continues with more vengence.We are just have to rally together and just keep howling, for if we don’t, the wolves will lose,along with the rest of the wildlife.For the Wild Ones.

  9. I’ve enjoyed your article. I’m a social studies teacher in Colorado, and am interested in doing a lesson talking about how the Victorian abhorrence of nature (think corsets and Manifest Destiny) has carried down through the years to our still-very-present hatred of carnivores of all types. This idea runs contrary to the Native American notions of nature, and I’d like my students to compare them. I remember reading of massive carnivore-hunts where all available meat-eaters were wiped out, especially wolves, but also coyotes, large cats, and bears, even foxes. If I remember correctly, they were not even loosely based on the excuse of actually-killed livestock, but the mere potential of carnivore-killed livestock. This pervasive fear of wolves and other carnivores seems so biased that it’s hard to understand. I’d love more information on these hunts, as my students have expressed disbelief that any bias against carnivores persists. Do you have any sources for this? When did such hunts end (assuming hopefully that they cannot still be held), and where were they used? Is there any information on the ecological impact in those areas? I’d appreciate any help you can offer! Thanks again for attempting to address a long-held misconception.

    • Hi Ginnie,
      It’s refreshing to hear from a teacher who wants to inform her students about the nexus of wolf persecution in the 19th century, that led to wolves being exterminated in the West. Young people are our future and the they will be the caretakers of our wildlife, it’s so important they know the truth.

      I’m assuming that’s what you’re referring to because wolves in the Northern Rockies were delisted in 2009 by the Obama Admin. and two state run wolf hunts were held in Montana and Idaho. There is a lot of information on this blog about those hunts. I know it can be hard to navigate through this blog to find things. I’m working on re-organizing it.

      One of the best books on the extermination of wolves in this country by government trappers is “Predatory Bureaucracy, The Extermination of Wolves and the Transformation of the West” by Michael Robinson.http://predatorybureaucracy.com/book/

      Another book, that is a little hard to read because it details much of the horrific things done to wolves, is called Vicious, Men and Wolves in America by Jon Coleman. He’s not talking about wolves being vicious.

      Those are two good resources as well as the classic Of Wolves and Men by Barry Lopez. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=of+wolves+and+men&x=0&y=0

      If you need any help pulling up posts on this blog, let me know and I’ll try and find what you’re looking for.

      For the wolves, For the wild ones,
      Nabeki


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,515 other followers

%d bloggers like this: