USFWS 2009 Wolf Report…Just Peachy!

According to the newly published USFWS 2009 report on wolves, all is peachy in the Northern Rockies with wolves. The report touts the wolf population in the Northern Rockies grew in 2009 but the tiny 4% increase is the smallest since wolves were reintroduced in 1995. That’s because over 500 wolves were lost in 09 due to hunting, lethal control, SSS (shoot, shovel and shutup) and general wolf mortality. Yellowstone wolf numbers are below 100, from 124 in 2008.  The famous and studied Druid Peak Packwho once numbered 37, are now down to just one wolf, sadly the Druids are finished and so a legend fades into history. (Although we can hold out hope the missing six Druids will resurface)

USFWS states wolves are fully recovered and conveniently all the counting adds up so nicely for them.

Wolves were delisted by the Obama administration in Spring 2009. Since that time wolves have been hammered by Wildlife Services even though cattle depredations were lower then 2008. Yet 272 wolves died in the Northern Rockies in 2009 for killing 214 cows out of SIX MILLION COWS.  The irony is ranchers complaining about their tiny livestock losses were reimbursed $457,785 in 2009 by private and state agencies.

How many cattle have ranchers sent to their deaths? That would be 100%, unless they raise them as pets. It’s the ranchers not the wolves killing all the cows because cattle are raised to be killed for profit. Once cattle are old enough they are sent to feed lots to be fattened up, then sent off to the slaughterhouse. Over 41 million cows die horrible deaths every year in this country for the cattle and dairy industries. 

Since wolves were delisted over fifteen years ago the feds have killed 1300 wolves for 1300 cattle depredations. Don’t you find that tit for tat style “management” simply appalling?   How many cows do you think died in the last fifteen years from disease, weather, theft and reproductive issues? Millions! Yet the government continues the war against wolves, spending close to four million dollars last year counting wolves, controlling wolves, stalking wolves, darting wolves and killing wolves. All that federal spending for a non-problem. Their 2010 wolf budget is projected to be $4,200,000. More wolf killing coming up.

Wolves do not deserve this kind of scrutiny or lethal control. This is a PR campaign to appease constantly complaining ranchers and hunters who blow the wolf issue completely out of proportion and everyone knows it. The key statement in the USFWS wolf report is: 

“Although wolf depredation results in a comparatively small proportion of all livestock losses in the NRM DPS, wolf damage can be significant to some livestock producers.” 

Get it? Wolves kill miniscule numbers of livestock but because ranchers complain, wolves are killed. Does this make any sense to you? What kind of management is this?  What about the non-ranching, non hunting public that would like to view wolves in the wild? Apparently our feelings and opinions don’t matter.

Cattle Losses From AGRO’s Website
In 2005, U.S. producers raised 104.5 million head of cattle (USDA, 2005a). Approximately every five years, NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service)reports on unintentional cattle deaths as a result of predation, weather issues, disease etc. The latest cattle death report was released in May 2006 (USDA, 2006). The government’s own figures again show that mammalian carnivores kill very few livestock (0.18%) 

Cattle Deaths from other causes: 3.5% (3,861,000)

Respiratory problems, Digestive problems, Calving, Unknown, Weather, Other Disease, Lameness/Injury, Metabolic Problems, Mastitis, Poison, Theft

===========================

In  2005 104,500,00 cattle were produced in the United States 

Carnivores killed  0.18% (190,000) Cattle

Coyotes (51%, 97,000), Other Unknown (21%), Domestic Dogs 21,9000), Felids (8% 14,700), Vultures (5%), Wolves (2% , 4400), Bears (1%)

The statistics don’t lie. Wolf kills on livestock are a blip on the radar screen. Heck vultures killed more cows then wolves in 2005. Coyotes were responsible for most of the kills by far but predation only accounted for 0.18% of cattle mortality, while other causes accounted for 3.5% or 3,861,000 dead cows.

Predation by mammlian carnivores is a tiny part of cattle mortality. Wolves are barely in the picture. Yet we have a huge federal program to track wolves like they are terrorists. The new USDA NASS cattle mortality figures will be out this year. I will be posting them. Is anyone in the wolf killing business really interested in these stats or is it simply about keeping wolf numbers low to boost ungulate populations and appease ranchers?  This is why I will repeat once more, State Game Agencies Should Not Be Managing Predators, period!

The USFWS report is all about wolf and livestock numbers but what it doesn’t include is a report on the hysteria that’s building in Idaho and Montana around wolves. The Idaho legislature actually passed a resolution asking their governor to declare a State of Emergency in Idaho concerning wolves. Idaho has already stated they want to reduce the wolf population from 850 to 500.  Montana FWP recently decided Wildlife Services can operate on their own to kill wolves, no longer needing permission from Montana FWP. Wolves can now be shot on sight by Wildlife Services for being near a dead cow. Joe Maurier, head of Montana FWP, stated hunting quotas would likely increase next year if wolves are not relisted. We all knew that was coming.

From the Missoulian:

“In a hearing before the Environmental Quality Council, Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks director Joe Maurier said federal Wildlife Services agents no longer need FWP authorization to kill wolves at or near confirmed livestock depredation sites.

The agents also will be able to immediately kill any wolves that are trapped when they return to those sites to feed on dead livestock.

“For the amount of conflict we have in all sectors today, we probably have too many wolves on the landscape,” Maurier told the council. “We had tolerable conflict on the landscape; now it’s intolerable. Now we have to go back to the point where it’s tolerable at all levels but we still have a viable population.”

Maurier added that he expects the wolf hunting quota to be increased next season from the initial statewide quota of 75 as another way to lower the wolf population. Initial estimates put Montana’s wolf population at 500 animals this year, which is about the same as last year.

IDFG has been given permission to land in the Frank Church wilderness to dart and collar wolves, which I believe is clearly a violation of The Wilderness Act. The Idaho hunt is  ongoing. It’s now the beginning of wolf denning season in Idaho and pregnant alphas are returning to their dens. Will they be killed in their dens before giving birth? I have to ask this question because Idaho extended it’s hunting season SEVEN LONG MONTHS, to March 31st, 2010.  I wonder what next years wolf count will look like if wolves are not relisted, because make no mistake this is an all out war on wolves. 

Things are most certainly not peachy for wolves in the Northern Rockies no matter how bright a picture USFWS wants to paint. The stark reality is wolf persecution has only increased since the hunts started. Wildlife Services has gotten bolder, wolf haters are crawling out of the wood work and I predict if wolves are not relisted we will see serious declines in wolf  numbers in 2010.

There is also nothing in the report about the effect the hunts have had on wolf packs, except to report  numbers. Wolves are highly socialized animals. When alphas or the mothers and fathers of a pack are killed the packs almost always disband. Twenty eight total wolf packs disappeared in 2009, 64% killed for livestock depredation. Oregon killed one entire wolf pack  for cows and they only have three total. Fairly amazing coming from a state I thought was progressive in it’s thinking. I guess ranching interests trump everything else, even in Oregon. Are any of the state game agencies prepared to fine ranchers for poor animal husbandry practices, ie. not protecting their investment, leaving livestock unattended? Will public grazing leases be pulled when ranchers refuse to remove dead cow carcasses not killed by wolves but left to rot?  If a wolf is caught feeding on one, they can be killed.

Did the hunts drive down the average age of wolves? If wolves are subjected to the Russian roulette (as Daniel MacNulty, wolf researcher calls it) of hunting and Wildlife Services killings each year, what chance do they have to retain cohesiveness and stability among packs?  Daniel MacNulty, the Yellowstone wolf  researcher, has stated hunting wolves pushes the age of wolves downward, resulting in younger and younger wolves.

 “It’s been shown in other hunted populations of wolves that hunting skews the population toward younger age classes,” he explains. And, as his research shows, that could spell more deaths, not fewer, for the elk.

The reason hunting pushes a population’s age structure downward is because being hunted is like playing Russian roulette. If, starting early in life, every member of a society had to play Russian roulette regularly, not too many would live to a ripe old age, he says.”

Despite the peachy picture painted by the USFWS 2009 wolf report, wolves need ESA protection, without it they will continue to be killed and persecuted, there is no middle ground on this.

2009 was a horrendous year for wolves and 2010 isn’t shaping up to be any better unless Judge Molloy rules to relist them. If he doesn’t there is no telling what fresh hell will reign down on wolves in the Northern Rockies.

 

Posted in: gray wolf /canis lupus, howling for justice, wolf 2009 delisting

Tags:  USFWS 2009 Interagency Wolf Report,  wolves or livestock, Frank Church Wilderness, aerial gunning of wolves, endangered species act

About these ads

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/usfws-2009-wolf-report-how-peachy/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

18 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. [...] USFWS 2009 Wolf Report…How Peachy « Howling For Justice [...]

  2. [...] USFWS 2009 Wolf Report…How Peachy « Howling For Justice [...]

  3. Wow. That’s incredibly sad that 500 wolves have been killed to date. I try to go to Yellowstone every year, but have yet to see wolves. They have always been something I have wanted to see, but never quite make it to Lamar Valley.(I have always fancied the bison and can sit for hours and watch them) I have recently started following what is going on in Monatana and Idaho. I am sickened by the fact that this beautiful animal is being killed because of livestock. I was just thinking the other day that the cattle and sheep probably suffer a far more traumatic death at the slaughter house than by any predator!!!! Hopefully this administration will wake up before it is too late!!

    • Hi Becky,
      It really is sad so many wolves were lost in the Northern Rockies and it’s still going on. The Idaho hunt doesn’t end until the end of this month. I’m skeptical of the rosy numbers USFWS is claiming. We had 1500 wolves in the Northern Rockies at the end of 2008. We lost 500 in 2009 which would bring the population down close to 1000. Now they are saying there are 1700 wolves in the Northern Rockies, which would mean 600 or so puppies would have been born in the beginning of 2009 and they all would have had to survive. Wolf pups have a high mortality rate, so that just doesn’t add up.

      If wolves aren’t relisted by Judge Molloy this year, it will be so much worse for them in 2010.

      For the wolves, For the wild ones,
      Nabeki

  4. THIS WOLF REPORT IS REALLY VERY TRAGIC!I CAN’T UNDERSTAND THIS STRONG HATE TO WOLVES…I CAN’T… MAKE ME CRAZY… I CRY WHEN I READ…AND I KNOW I CAN’T TO DO NOTHING…NOTHING !!! PLEASE,TAKE MY LIFE AND SAVE WOLVES!!! THAT’S ALL WHAT I WANT…

  5. DEAR NABEKI! I CAN SEND VIA PAYPAL LITTLE DONATION. PLEASE HELP ME, WHERE CAN I SEND? WHICH WOLVES HELP ORGANISATION THE MORE SERIOUS? I LOVE ALL WOLVES ON THE WORLD!

  6. Any idea when Judge Molloy is going to rule on this issue? I think the environmental groups asked for a swift ruling and he declined that, but I was wondering if anyone had an idea how long it would take for a decision.

    • Hi Lyndell,
      No clue but sooner rather then later is my motto. The longer this craziness goes on the worse it gets.

      N.

  7. The famous and studied Druid Peak Pack, who once numbered 37, are now down to just one wolf, sadly the Druids are finished and so a legend fades into history.

    Really? National Geographic says otherwise. The pack has the mange but apparently it’s still there.

  8. Some of us diehards are waiting patiently for #480 to emerge from the tree line, strong, healthy and paired up with a new strong and healthy Alpha female. Then wahhlaah – The Druids return to Lamar in their usual Druid fashion – dramatically:):)

    • That would be oh so sweet Cindy. I’ll HOWL for that!!

      N.

  9. Hi Becky,
    Nabeki recently had information on this site about a movie called Earthlings. If you get a chance, google it and watch it online or better yet, order the DVD from the Earthlings website. This movie is a “gloves off” look at how animals are being treated in this country, in not only the livestock industry, but in every avenue, like the fur industry, the entertainment business and how alot of animal shelters deal with the populations of unwanted pets.

    It is terribly sad to watch but it WILL open your eyes to how the “human species” continues to abuse other species on this planet. And then its your choice to pass it on to anyone in your circle (ten people, telling ten people, etc?) who have an ounce of compassion AND a voice.

  10. Okay wanted to say this:

    Here’s why the word ‘harvest’ when used as a term in hunting bothers and infuriates people:
    The use of the word is a euphemism for killing, somehow perceived to be a form of ‘respect’ by hunters for the animals they shoot/trap/whatever and, strangely, its to soften the blow for the people who get mad at them for doing so (like sport hunting). It is similar to when we call cow meat ‘beef’ in front of children so they take longer to understand that ‘meat’ is taken from a living organism not just something that magically appears on a store shelf. The euphemism carries about as much respect for the life as quoting to use a child as a ‘sacrifice’ – no matter the method used. It is disrespectful because it likens the animal to little more than a stalk of wheat in a field that can be infinitely replenished. This ‘horn of plenty’ attitude is a factor that has led to over-hunting and poaching (because while hunters may place blame onto poachers as the devil of their ranks, poachers are little more than those that just plumb disagree that they shouldn’t be allowed to kill that animal).
    ‘Harvest’ also implies a degree of ownership and mastery, which is both conceited and disrespectful of the strengths of wildlife. In a nutshell: ‘Harvesting game’ another condescending euphemism.
    But that is stating the obvious no?

    • Thanks John for the explanation. I have always associated the word harvest with ungulates. To hear it applied to wolves is even more rancorous. Another euphemism they like to use to descripbe killing wolves, is “management”. Not sure which term I dislike more. Probably “management” because it implies they are doing something noble or it’s part of their job to “manage” wolves.

      As you stated wolves have done nothing to deserve the treatment they’re getting. Their only crime is they “don’t buy hunting licenses” and have no say in the politics of death that governs their lives. I think this quote sums it up for me and I direct it at all the wolf “managers”.

      May we all never be judged by anything so harshly or held to as strict a life or unremitting of borders as the ones we try to place on and around wolves…….The Ninemile Wolves, Rick Bass

      N.

  11. State of emergency? What emergency?

    • Loua….It’s just wolf propaganda. They’re like sharks, they smell blood in the water and want to take the chance to get rid of wolves, just like the first time. The fact Obama delisted them, Montana and Idaho went forward with hunts mere months after wolves lost their protections, it says to the haters that it’s open season on wolves. It’s all about perception, not fact. That’s why Judge Molloy’s decision is so important. I hope it comes soon, the longer this drags on the worse it is for wolves.

      N.

  12. EDIT: By the way what I meant was that they are wrong by saying that there is a “state of emergency”


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,495 other followers

%d bloggers like this: