News From The Front…

No ruling yet over wolf settlement

Friday, March 25, 2011 12:00 am

MISSOULA — Ten conservation groups and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service asked a federal judge Thursday to approve their plan to lift endangered species protections for wolves in Montana and Idaho, effectively reversing his previous rulings on the matter.

But four other conservation groups who splintered from the plaintiffs told U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy the proposed settlement is driven by politics, not science, and will hurt the species before it has fully recovered.

“If the settlement agreement is entered, one thing is clear: hundreds of wolves will die,” said Jay Tutchton, attorney for two of the groups.

Molloy said he would rule soon on whether to recommend the proposed deal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over the case since Molloy ruled for the plaintiffs last August and the federal government appealed.

CLICK HERE to read the rest of the article.

=======

Groups lay out opposition to proposed wolf settlement

By EVE BYRON Independent Record , The Billings Gazette

Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:00 am

HELENA — Two environmental groups who don’t want to settle the lawsuit over the delisting of gray wolves in Montana and Idaho say they don’t understand how their former partners in the federal court case can now support state wolf management plans that they previously found so inadequate.

A court-ordered response from what’s being called “the nonsettling parties” that was filed this week by the Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Friends of the Clearwater lays out their concerns with the proposed settlement that will come before U.S. District Court Judge Donald Molloy on Thursday in Missoula.

Mike Garrity, the Alliance’s executive director, said nothing substantial has changed with wolf management since the case was filed by 14 environmental groups in 2009. The groups claimed that the Department of Interior was wrong when it decided wolves could be considered a “recovered” species no longer facing extinction in Montana and Idaho, but not in Wyoming.

The split among states “failed to ensure that the northern Rockies wolf population exhibits genetic connectivity essential to its survival, and will allow the wolf population in Idaho and Montana to decline dramatically …” the groups stated in the lawsuit.

CLICK HERE to read the rest of the article.

=======

Photo: Courtesy kewlwallpaper.com

Posted in: Wolf Wars

Tags: “settlement”, Judge Molloy, 10j, Montana and Idaho wolves in jeopardy

Advertisements
Published in: on March 25, 2011 at 2:18 am  Comments (8)  
Tags: , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2011/03/25/news-from-the-front/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. NEVER forget the 10 “settling plaintiffs”.

    Like

    • No, I will never forget who they were.

      Like

      • Nor will I Rita.

        N.

        Like

    • Very powerful Jerry…I posted it on WW.

      N.

      Like

  2. DEAR NABEKI! i can’t belive,i can’t!!!Defenders of Wildlife???? Center for Biological Diversity??? Greater Yellowstone Coalition??? Oregon Wild??? Cascadia Wildlands Priject??? Wildlands Network??? THEY ARE ONLY DIRTY TRAITORS! WHAT THEY ARE DOING IT’S A DIRTINESS! Sorry,DEAR NABEKI for my words,but i’m so upset! THE WORLD HAS TURNED UPSIDE DOWN…I can’t understand! WHY, MY GOD WHY WOLVES CAN’T LIVE IN PEACE????????? WHY?????

    Like

    • The world is turning upside down Agnes and wolves have been sold out. It amazes me they caved so quickly. You don’t run from a fight, this just showed the other side weakness and made a mockery of Judge Molloy’s decision. Now they are asking him to reverse himself. Just awful

      N.

      Like

  3. Now…This is getting really, really suspicious. I truly am speechless at this. How could they, just throwing the towel on something so important?
    I have a feeling there has to be something behind this. It’s absolutely absurd. And they think, as Nabeki said, that there are still going to be wolves in the NR for 2016? I’m sure, there will be only a few traumatized packs scattered around.
    If nothing is done right now, this could easily become one of the most catastrophic environmental fails of the 21rst century.

    Like

    • Loua…they tied their own hands and gave everything away and for what? Rehberg is still pressing ahead with his wolf bill, so are others. All this has done is divide us and make us look weak. It’s just the worst possible thing that could have happened. I don’t think Judge Molloy will go along with it. That’s my gut feeling. But the situation is turning into a three ring circus.

      N.

      Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: