Why It’s Bad To Be A Wolf in Northeastern Washington


 by Anonymous for Wolves
October 26, 2014
For a time, I lived in an old log cabin on 146 acres in Northwest Montana, a stone’s throw from a collared wolf pack, and I listened to their haunting howls during the morning’s wee hours.

Following Montana, I lived in the Methow Valley (on the east slopes of Washington’s North Cascade mountains), fifteen crow miles from the Lookout wolf pack, the pack that the White family all but destroyed. The White’s had lost no livestock to wolves while they attempted to ship bloody wolf pelts to Canada, emailing boasts and images of the dead wolves to friends.

 I spoke up for the Wedge Pack in Olympia (WA’s capitol), after seven members of the pack were shot from a helicopter by Wildlife Services in 2012, all to protect irresponsibly ranged cows grazing on terrain unsuitable to livestock. Lethal removal of the Wedge, said WDFW director Phil Anderson, would hit a re-set button with ranchers so that the action would not need to be repeated. I was at the meeting when he spoke these words and they were indeed in this context.

I now live a handful of miles from the Canadian border, on the west slopes of the North Cascades and I will tell you there are wolves here, dispersers and with packs on the horizon. I saw my first wolf fourteen years ago in this greater Kulshan area, and my second wolf nine years ago in a canyon above the Methow Valley.

On Tuesday, October seventh, I attended the WDFW wolf meeting in Colville, Stevens County, in northeastern Washington. I sat quietly and observed during the meeting, taking notes and quotes, as well as images with my camera. The crowd in attendance was filled mainly with ranchers and with those opposing wolf recovery. It was a lynch mob scene! WDFW allowed the crowd to call out mean-spirited comments to those few who spoke in support of wolves (this was ranching country, after all). WDFW allowed those speaking against wolves to talk well in excess of their allotted three minutes, permitting speakers to talk back to the WDFW panel and refuse to sit down and shut up when asked. Rancher Len McIrvine refused to stop talking well after using his and other’s time allotments, and the crowd cheered. The department allowed this behavior.

WDFW allowed the crowd to stand and cheer loudly when there was talk of wolves having been killed: the Ruby creek female hit by a car and the Huckleberry female flushed out of dense forest (forest unsuitable for grazing) and shot from a helicopter by Wildlife Services.

I acquired the necropsy report for the Huckleberry female and interviewed the department’s veterinarian who had performed the necropsy and had written the report. It is notable that the Huckleberry pack female’s stomach was empty when she was shot dead. She had not eaten for close to two days. She certainly hadn’t been eating the rancher Dashiell’s sheep, and so the non-lethal tactics and helicopter hazing had worked. And yet a wolf needed to die.

 The Colville crowd called for three more Huckleberry wolves to die, and better yet the whole pack! They demanded a total of at least four dead wolves, although the department had said they would shoot “up to four wolves” never guaranteeing they would shoot four wolves total. The WDFW panel just sat and listened to the calls for more dead wolves, nodding their heads and looking sympathetic, never making this correction to the ranchers’ demands for more wolf blood to be spilled.

The department’s initial statement regarding the aerial assault on the Huckleberry pack is that they would only shoot if there were multiple animals under the helicopter as a means of size comparison so that they would only take out pups and two year-old wolves. They would not target black, adult wolves as the collared male is black (they use the collars for tracking purposes, of course). Later the department’s directive was amended (changed and twisted) and it was stated they would remove any wolf (or wolves) but for the collared male.

When the Huckleberry female was shot, she was the sole animal under the under helicopter and weighed close to 70 pounds while alive (reports of 65 and 66 lbs were post-mortem, although WDFW never made this clear). Said the department’s carnivore specialist Donny Moratello, “We were certainly disappointed in this outcome but, there was no way to sort from the air in this circumstance.” When I asked him why take the risk of shooting the wrong wolf if there is no means of comparison, he replied, “You know going into it you get what you get. We did not have the opportunity to sort in this case.” As well as saying, “To not shoot (a wolf) they would have not been complying with the directive at that point, they would not be following orders.”

So, you get what you get. The helicopter had been up on multiple occasions over a number of days, unable to spot animals due to the visibility limits of the dense terrain, terrain unsuitable for healthy and responsible ranching and in which the sheep were being grazed. Simply, the lethal endeavor was becoming too expensive, so they flushed out a single black, adult sized wolf and shot. Blam! They shot the breeding female whose pups at the time were only a little over 4 months old and unable to hunt on their own. The department’s reports to this day say the pups were almost full grown but, this is grossly inaccurate as per their own veterinarian.

It is also important to note from WDFW’s own reports and slide presentation, that most of the wolf activity and depredations fell outside of Dashiell’s grazing allotment. Dashiell had not had a working range rider for close to thirty days; during the onset and well into the confirmed depredation activity. He had merely two working guard dogs which, is insufficient for the size of the herd (1800) and sprawling, densely forested terrain. Two more guard dogs and additional human presence were added around the period of the Huckleberry kill order, but it was too little too late. Wolves needed to die.

Additionally, rancher Dashiell had not been removing sheep carcasses including well before the confirmed depredations, as evidenced by the carcass’ level of decomposition and thus, the inability to determine cause of death.

Northeastern Washington commissioners spoke in support of the ranchers and the call for dead wolves, speaking to taking matters of wolf control in their own hands. There was talk of shooting, trapping and most of all, poisoning the wolves. In a Seattle Times article Rancher Len McIrvine is quoted as saying, “Our ancestors knew what had to happen — you get poison and you kill the wolves.”

The quad-county commissioners grandstanded and played to the lynch mob. Jim DeTro, Okanogan County commissioner opened his speech with, “Welcome to Okanogan County where you can now drink a Bud’, smoke a bud and marry your bud.” He said this with obvious disdain and the crowd laughed loudly. He said, “People in my county have decided to not shoot, shovel and shut up, but to be totally silent.” He said this as a wink and nod to poisoning wolves while the department panel sat there silently, nodding their heads up and down and looking sympathetic.

I tell you, when a wolf is killed illegally and poisoned, WDFW is guilty of complicity y by not speaking out against these illegal acts and by nodding their heads up and down in agreement.

DeTro continued on that people in his county don’t want the agency to know when they’ve seen a wolf or experienced (alleged) wolf depredation. They want, he said, to take matters in their own hands. DeTro then said smiling proudly, “Olympia, you have a problem.”

Mike Blankenship, Ferry County commissioner, stood there and encouraged people to take matters in their own hands, as well. All the while, WDFW just sat there nodding their heads, looking sympathetic and remaining silent. More complicity!

A local sheriff said, “Wolves are messy eaters, scattering a cow from hell to breakfast,” and making other inflammatory statements about wolves to the again cheering crowd. He said he was “pissed” that only one Huckleberry pack member had been killed.

One rancher cried out angrily, “Wolves kill to eat!” I was curious then, as to what he had done to his livestock before they ended up in the grocer’s meat section, if his livestock were not also killed to be eaten.

At the end of the meeting, WDFW director Phil Anderson acted very cozy and familiar with the ranchers, in spite of them having raked him mercilessly over the coals for not killing more wolves.

He looked sympathetic and referred to them by name, and recalled riding around in their trucks with them. Anderson said he would plan a closed meeting with the area ranchers to discuss wolf issues and management. I demand that NO meeting in relation to Washington wolves be closed.

Two final points:

-In the case of the Huckleberry pack, the department did not adequately implement the state’s wolf management plan, nor did they adhere to their own published procedures, before lethal removal took place. This negligence WILL NOT be repeated.

-We demand full documentation of every wolf mortality, and that given the threats to use poisons, we expect that toxicology reports be made public as part of any necropsy, where cause of death has not otherwise been determined. If wolves are poisoned, WDFW will be held guilty of complicity due to their behavior in Colville; supporting poisoning by remaining silent and nodding their heads up and down.

While I sat silently during the Colville meeting, a rancher two rows back passed me a piece of paper on which he had scrawled, “Wolf Lover!” When I looked back at him he scowled at me severely. I wrote in reply on the note, “So?” along with a happy face, and passed it back to him. I’ll take his accusation as a compliment.


Photo: Courtesy kewlwallpapersdotcom

Posted in: Washington wolves, Wolf Wars, gray wolf

Tags: anonymous for wolves, Huckleberry pack, WDFW, killing wolves, Northeastern Washington, ranchers, Huckleberry Pack alpha female

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2014/10/26/why-its-bad-to-be-a-wolf-in-northeastern-washington/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

21 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. What I can’t understand is that ranchers and vets should be the leading authorities on animal husbandry and should understand the ways of the wolf. If they don’t understand the ways of all domestic and wild animals they should not be in the business of looking after the animals, wolves only eat when they are hungry and if ranchers look after their cattle and sheep properly all could live in harmony.


  2. Anonymous for Wolves – October 26, 2014
    I would hate to attend a meeting like this one you attended. I would become very angry at the ignorance, lies and hatred that these so-called farmers display. I also cannot understand that the scientific figures that are available, proves that these ranchers loose more livestock through disease than wolves, and if they had enough herders and dogs watching their stock, they would not loose a single animal to the wolves. The use of public lands by the farmers should not be allowed in any State – that alone would stop any so-called incidents.

    Thank you for the information, even though it is not what I would like to hear, we have to be well informed, so that we don’t end up as ignorant and stupid as the farmers and other officials involved.


    • A Fish and Wildlife Director sets the tone for how wildlife will be treated. This one blatantly is NOT compassionate or concerned about wolf welfare. He is the ranchers’ puppet while our taxes pay his salary. Do you want this monster to continue this brutality and pay for it?
      Never underestimate the power of one individual in creating change by leading others. I see strength and respect for wolves in the post from Anonymous. Power comes from tenacity, courage and moral commitment. It comes from public education and rallying for change. Wolves deserve better! Make some noise!


  3. Thank you for your courage and fortitude.

    And I say “so” along with you and those others who love wolves and support their right to thrive.


  4. Reblogged this on Freedom For Cetaceans.


  5. It sounds like they all need to be removed from their positions in northeastern Washington!! They feed on hate and ignorance, the world would be such a better place if people like this didn’t exist. Unfortunately they do and we have to continue the fight!!


    • The WA Director of Fish and Wildlife sets the tone and allows such brutal behavior. Therein lies the problem.


  6. Leave them alone! They belong to everyone and your abuse is not allowed! You’re a bunch of psychos!


  7. Washington’s DFW is seeking applicants for its Wolf Advisory Group to advise the department on wolf recovery and management: http://wdfw.wa.gov/news/oct1514a/


  8. Agreed! Well stated!


  9. What a bunch of wolfhaters. And Big Thanks to You Wolf Lover for your courage to be there.


  10. Thanks for posting it is a sad year for wolves across the USA


  11. I had failed to understand why ranchers had, when polled, NOT wanted reimbursement when the feds gave up wolves to the states, but now, after your post, DO understand. The states are complicit in the killing, and will not likely move a finger should they discover ranchers had killed any.
    In this way, the ranchers can act as if there are no wolves, while shooting and poisoning every one. If any have hunting dogs, expect them to pursue wolves at denning and rendezvous time.

    I had had two thoughts in recent months, one of trying to help ranchers and pro wolf advocates get along, get to know one another, as this is a strong way for people not to act on their worst impulses.

    The other, now possibly the only way to deal with them, was to materially act. It looks like the latter is the only way remaing, although those who do will be labeled as bad guys by the law.

    I note in passing that the lawyer trying to get personhood for chimps and whales, does not include wolves, a species that constantly communicates and constantly pays attention to, and understands much of other species, including ours. It is certainly time to alert that lawyer and his organization of the necessity to add the Gray Wolf to his list of animals needing personhood.

    Now, the author above has worked within the corrupt an deeply flawed system which is allowing this execution and genocide. I wonder how many might want to materially act against the welfare ranchers occupying public lands, and any others who believe they can kill this other intelligent species with impunity.

    Liked by 1 person

    • After the shotgun poaching of 2 members of the Wedge Pack was reported in Spring 2012 to WA Fish and Games, the McIrvin drunks poisoned the caller’s dogs, killing them through a long and painful death. Fish and Games never even put in the eye WITNESS report! It is obvious Fish and Games is in with them, as they tried to pretend there weren’t wolves there, told the caller to “keep quiet”, then 3 months later in Summer of 2012, suddenly “discovered” the Wedge Pack, collared a male, then set up their murders. Innocent pets. They murdered innocent pets. For speaking up!!!!!!!!!!! The Sheriff, McIrvins, and the dirty Dashiell’s are thoroughly corrupt, and acting outside of the law, while pretending to be what they are not. The feds need to step in and put these lunatics away!!!!!!! Or SOMEONE!!!!!!!!!!


  12. And the Americans like the world to believe that they are the most intelligent human race existing on this earth. If they continue as they are with the wolves, they are no better than the Africans who kill the elephants, rhinos etc. shame on you, and I congratulate those who are trying to save the wolves. Please not just the grey wolves, but ALL wolves.


  13. Why do you consider animals as insignificant? You went back on your word, why? Does this involve votes or money? Bad choice and example!


  14. Yes it is horrible. It is also horrible to be a wolf in Wisconsin. Wisconsin killed 70% off their quota in 7 days, closed 4 zones (over killed in the zones) and 85% of the wolves were TRAPPED! DNR says nothing. Minnesota starts it 3rd hunt on NOVEMBER. Please vote Pro Wolf. You can make a difference no matter where you live. Know YOUR legislatures opinion.


  15. It’s horrible to be a wolf anywhere. Wolves, just go one by one… It’s not ever a good feeling, I mean we humans and people are well we don’t wanna die, we sometimes do wanna die, if we feel like nothing.. Or if your depressed, but we have fear of dying… We sometimes get the choice but not usually it’s very rare for us humans to decide if we wanna die… Today tomorrow or next week, or next month, next year.. Next decade… But wolves don’t get a choice whether they like it or not.. They just get surrounded and don’t get to speak.. Or say what they want, I think when the wolf is panicking the wolf will howl.. And in a fear tone.. It’s not good to be a wolf, but it’s also not good or be a human.. Now is it?

    For the wolves, for the supporters.


    • This last blog should be put into all the newspapers in the States and Canada, it says everything!


  16. We need a national campaign to get these arrogant, ignorant welfare ranchers off of our public lands, once and for all. I am sick and tired of my hard-earned tax dollars subsidizing the destruction of native wildlife and habitat, year after year. Who the hell do they think they are?


  17. Reblogged this on eliseallen27's Blog.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: