Oregon Delists Wolves – Woefully Inadequate Wolf Management Plan To Blame

OR_Mt_Emily_male_wolf_brown_May_25_14_odfw_

November 11, 2015

There was a chance, back in 2010, to make changes to Oregon’s bad wolf management plan, which requires only 4 breeding pairs for 3 consecutive years, in Eastern Oregon, to get the ball rolling on delisting. I know I’ve repeated this many times but it infuriates me that with barely 80 wolves in the state, a population not even close to “recovery”, whatever that means, Oregon did the unthinkable.  Just five years after the state’s wolf plan was up for review, Oregon wolves were let down. Now the state is on an inexorable march toward wolf hunts. Sound familiar?

===

From Center For Biological Diversity

For Immediate Release, November 9, 2015

Oregon Strips State Endangered Species Protections From Gray Wolves 

Decision Counter to Science, State Law

PORTLAND, Ore.— Ignoring state law, as well as experts who say that Oregon’s wolves are not yet recovered, the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission today voted to strip gray wolves of state endangered species act protections. The commission based its decision on a controversial Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife report that leading scientists have characterized as severely flawed. The Center for Biological Diversity and allies vowed to challenge the decision in state court.

“With just 80 or so wolves in the entire state, gray wolves are nowhere near recovery,” said Amaroq Weiss, the Center’s West Coast wolf organizer. “Wolves deserve a real chance at recovery. I’m deeply disappointed the commission decided to blatantly ignore the science, the law and the will of the majority of Oregonians.”

Wolves were once widely distributed throughout Oregon but were eradicated from the state by a government-sponsored effort and a bounty system on behalf of livestock operators. In 1999 a wolf from Idaho made her way into the state, soon followed by several other wolves from Idaho, most of which were illegally shot and killed. The commission adopted a state wolf conservation and management plan in 2005 and in 2008 the state’s first breeding pair was confirmed. Recent estimates by state officials estimate the current population at around just 80 animals; these animals live in only 12 percent of what researchers have identified as suitable wolf habitat in Oregon, with nearly the entire wolf population located in the northeastern portion of the state.

“There’s simply no science to support the conclusion that 80 wolves is a recovered population,” said Weiss. “This is a purely political decision made at the behest of livestock and hunting interests. Oregonians expect more from their state government than kowtowing to narrow special interests.”

The Department’s chief argument for delisting is that leaving wolves listed could result in a decline in social tolerance for the species, but this assumption has been debunked by multiple peer-reviewed papers reporting that removing protections for wolves elsewhere has had the opposite effect.

“The Commission’s decision ignored the most current science and has now placed these exquisite animals at greater risk of being killed,” said Weiss.

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2015/wolf-11-09-2015.html

===

Contact the Governor of Oregon and let her know how you feel. 

Governor Kate Brown
State Capitol Building
900 Court Street NE, 160
Salem, OR 97301
Phone: (503) 378-4582

===

Help Change Oregon’s Wolf Management Plan, PLEASE COMMENT BY JUNE 30, 2010

Oregon’s first radio-collared wolf just after its release, with ear tags and a radio collar. Photo taken May 3, 2009. More information: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/news/2009/may/050409.asp

Oregon’s first radio-collared wolf just after its release, with ear                    tags and a radio collar. Photo taken May 3, 2009.

June 21, 2010

Guest Post by Katie, Oregon resident and wolf advocate.

June 21, 2010

The Oregon Wolf Management Plan is currently under a 5-year review and the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is accepting comments from the public until June 30th. However, before I tell you about the plan and its obstacles, here is a brief history of the Oregon wolves.

In Oregon, the last gray wolf was eradicated from the state by the 1940s. It was almost 60 years before another one was seen. The first wolf to migrate to the state in 1999 was recaptured and sent back to Idaho. In 2000, two more gray wolves made the journey, but sadly they were both killed; one by a car and one by bullet. The fact that wolves were returning was undeniable, so the state decided they needed a plan. The ODFW sat down with wolf advocates and livestock owners to decide what should be done. Though the livestock owners may have gotten more say in the plan, wolf advocates seemed glad to simply be getting wolves back in the state. The result was a wolf management plan that everyone agreed on. Oregon became one of the first states to willingly open the doors for gray wolves to return.

In 2008, a female Idaho wolf was located in Oregon using the signals from her radio collar. The gray wolf was identified as “B-300”. To bring more attention to wolf recovery in Oregon, the members of a local environmental group, called Oregon Wild, nicknamed the wolf “Sophie”. Eventually finding a mate, Sophie soon became the alpha female of the largest pack in Oregon with 10 wolves total; the Imnaha Pack. Another pack of four wolves was also discovered in 2008. Together, the two packs made up Oregon’s known gray wolf population of 14 individuals.

The plan seemed perfect. Wolves were returning and things seemed to be going well. However, in 2009, two yearling wolves were convicted of killing 29 domestic animals from five different incidents. When non-lethal techniques failed, Wildlife Services was sent in and killed both wolves. Personally, I don’t blame the wolves, they were just pups. Being too young to hunt elk, it was either that or starve. They had no known pack and just seemed to have traveled into Oregon from Idaho on their own. It is possible that their family was killed by a rival pack, but I believe it is more likely that they were killed for “management” purposes.

Now, in 2010, history seems to be repeating itself as two more wolves are being targeted by WS. With only 14 known wolves in the entire state, killing two individuals would be a huge loss. ODFW has also issued seven kill permits to local ranchers, which could spell disaster for such a fragile population.

CURRENT PLAN

Oregon current Wolf Management Plan included three phases for population recovery:

PHASE ONE

 “Wolves may be considered for statewide delisting once the population reaches four breeding pairs for three consecutive years in eastern Oregon…. The plan calls for managing wolves in western Oregon as if the species remains listed until the western Oregon wolf population reaches four breeding pairs.”

This means when there are four packs in eastern Oregon and four in western Oregon, wolves will be stripped of ESA protection statewide.

The average gray wolf pack size is about 8 wolves. If packs in Oregon follow the norm, then roughly 64 wolves will be present when they are delisted. A recent study suggests Oregon could support up to 2200 wolves and still maintain a healthy ecosystem. I don’t know about you, but 64 wolves doesn’t sound like recovered to me.

PHASE TWO

 “Once the wolf is delisted, more options are available to address wolf-livestock conflict. While there are five to seven breeding pairs, landowners may kill a wolf involved in chronic depredation with a permit. Five to seven breeding pairs is considered the management population objective, or Phase 2.”

Five to seven breeding pairs? Oregon currently has two breeding pairs and seven landowners have been given permits to kill wolves. Again, five to seven breeding pairs is 40-56 wolves if they are the average pack size.

PHASE THREE

“Under Phase 3 a limited controlled hunt could be allowed to decrease chronic depredation or reduce pressure on wild ungulates if confirmed wolf predation leads to declines in localized herds.”

Sound familiar? Idaho and Montana initiated hunts mere months after wolves were delisted. The difference is there were 1500 wolves in Montana and Idaho when the first hunts began. In Oregon the hunt could start with less than 100.

To read the full Oregon Wolf Management Plan, go tohttp://www.dfw.state.or.us/Wolves/docs/wolf_plan.pdf

As you can see, the Oregon Wolf Management Plan is weak and gives livestock owners plenty of tools to deal with wolf depredation. However, the Oregon Cattle Association wants more power. Since the plan is under a 5-year review, OCA is suggesting changes to the plan that will suit the cattle industry, not wolves.

OCA’S TESTIMONY

1. Delisting rules (combine the whole state and begin delisting when there are 4 breeding pairs statewide)”

Four breeding pairs would be approximately 32 wolves. Even if each pack was as big as Sophie’s that would still only be 40 wolves, which is definitely not recovered.

2. “Relocation, location, and translocation eliminated”

The current management plan allows for “problem” wolves to be relocated to the closest wilderness area. The closest wilderness area is usually where the wolf came from before it found the livestock. This part of the plan needs to be strengthened, not weakened.

3. Ownership of lands ,IE; state lands is the only lands the Oregon ESA has authority on”

They are asking to change Oregon’s ESA. Not only would this be bad for wolves, but it would also allow anyone to shoot any endangered animal if it was on their property. Remember, these are changes they want now, not when the gray wolf population is 60+, but when there are only 14 wolves in Oregon.

To see the full testimony from the Oregon Cattle Association, go to:http://www.oregonwild.org/fish_wildlife/bringing_wolves_back/OCA_Testimony.pdf

To see the testimony from Oregon Wild, a local environmental group, go to:http://www.oregonwild.org/fish_wildlife/bringing_wolves_back/oregon-wild-wolf-plan-review-testimony-3-12.10/

ODFW is currently accepting comments from the public about changes they should make to the plan. ODFW has not said what they are thinking of changing but the first draft is scheduled to be done some time in August. The deadline to comment is June 30th.

Email your comments to ODFW.Comments@state.or.us

=======

Talking Points:

 1. Make sure to let them know you want the wolf plan STRENGTHENED, not weakened. Tell them eight breeding pairs statewide are NOT enough. Mention the study that states Oregon could support 2200 gray wolves on its landscape.

 2. Wildlife officials need more options to relocate wolves. Suggest national or state parks, or larger wilderness areas.

 3. Ranchers need to do everything possible to protect their livestock before any action against wolves is even considered. Suggest proper fencing, fladery, radio collar activated sounds, guardian animals, lambing and calving sheds, frequent patrols of pastures, placing livestock in barns at night, and tracking packs to avoid placing cattle in areas where wolves are known to be.

4. Tell them wolves are more valuable alive than dead, because they are. Support this idea by stating Yellowstone Park makes $7-10 million annually from just wolves (The GYA brings in $35 million wolf generated dollars). Explain the positive impacts wolves have on the environment, like increasing beaver populations (beavers are Oregon’s state animal). Wolves keep ungulates moving, which prevents them from over-browsing vital beaver and songbird habitat. Wolves keep ungulate herds healthy by culling the weak, sick and old.

5. Tell them to increase the funding of the wolf plan. Currently the wolf plan is very underfunded and only has a few members on its management team.

6. If you don’t live in Oregon, you can choose to boycott the state if they weaken the management plan. Tell them you will not buy anything from Oregon or visit the state unless the plan is strengthened.

7.  Think of the Imnaha wolf pack and how much they need our help. Their exigence as a pack is in danger. How sad it would be to lose the only breeding pair of wolves in Oregon.

=======

Don’t forget to email your comments to ODFW and voice your opinion about the Oregon Wolf Management Plan.Comments@state.or.us

Sources Cited:

http://www.oregonwild.org

http://www.predatorfriendly.org/index.html

http://www.dfw.state.or.us/Wolves/docs/wolf_plan.pdf

http://www.oregonwild.org/fish_wildlife/bringing_wolves_back/OCA_Testimony.pdf

http://www.yellowstonepark.com/MoreToKnow/ShowNewsDetails.aspx?newsid=132

 ===

Top Wolf Gif: Tumblr

Middle Photo: ODFW

Middle Photo: Courtesy Rick Lamplugh

Bottom Photo: ODFW

Posted in: Oregon wolves, Ranching and Hunting, Wolf Wars

Tags: Oregon, bad wolf management plan, delisting, ODFW, ranchers, poachers, wolf dispersal

===

Photos: Courtesy ODFW

Posted in: Oregon wolves, Wolf Wars

Tags  Oregon delists wolves, bad wolf management plan, wolves not safe anywhere,  fish and game agencies, wolf wars, eventual Oregon wolf hunts, Center for Biological Diversity

Advertisements

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://howlingforjustice.wordpress.com/2015/11/11/oregon-delists-wolves-woefully-inadequate-wolf-management-plan-to-blame/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

16 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. This is just disgusting!!! How in the world do they even think those numbers qualify as de-listing????? Shame on you Oregon, and I was thinking of possibly retiring in that state in a few years.To the point of already researching real estate options etc. Not ANYMORE! This is truly appalling. I always thought this state protected the wolves and nature in general (which is why I was looking to move there). Guess I was wrong. Such a shame.

    Like

  2. What can be said? I believe that state Fish & Wildlife agencies are for sale to private bidders. This is corruption on a massive scale and present in nearly every state. They should all be brought before a Congressional investigative committee, oh wait, we dont have a reasonable or effective Congress so we can forget that idea. The F& W service is out to eradicate ALL WILDLIFE. They only hope to make as much $$ as possible while doing it.

    Like

  3. Where is OR-7 and his family? We need to watch him carefully. Some low intelligence thug will shoot him using the McKittrick excuse to cover his butt and get away with it. It is appalling how gov’t agencies refuse to acknowledge this. You know that some missing link idiot is just waiting for this. I hope there is a way to protect him for them.

    Hopefully OR will stay in CA where rational people are.

    Like

    • Or ‘transitional fossil’ will try to harm him and get away with it. That term seems more correct.

      Like

    • He’s a wise wolf, having evaded even being seen since his last personal sighting a number of years ago. His mate chose some safe territory (as wolves do – if you look at any agency maps of wolf dens, you will find they never abut roads or trails) with adequate elk and other ungulate presence and no roads – they denned in a wilderness area.

      Polled, more than 80% of hunters said they would shoot a wolf if they had a chance, so now you know who to go after.

      Cattlermens associations and farm bureaus put the most political and money pressure on refusing to tolerate wolves, so you now know who NOT to support (grow your own vegetables and do NOT buy US meat, if you eat meat.)

      Act vociferously AGAINST state takeover of federal lands, lobby for wilderness and national monuments, VOTE AGAINST anyone who does not favor wolves – this means against the ENTIRE republican party, and any democrat who flies with them on privatizing lands, failing to designate wilderness, promotes hunting in any way, is pro-gun, or pro- motorized access to public lands in ANY way (Wolf mortality is DIRECTLY associated with road access.
      I also act against the legality of outfitter – hunting, packstock entry into public lands, etc.

      Now that you know that two major groups – the gun/hunting, and the livestock industry , it is up to YOU to deny them everything, including existence on public lands. If you have the means, do what Ted Turner did — buy a ranch, remove fencing, and return bison, antelope, elk, wolves, bears, etc.

      But above all, you MUST NOT SUPPORT THESE GROUPS, THEIR POLITICAL PARTIES AND REPRESENTATIVES
      Your governor, remember? is the one who appoints. SO if you’re inn NM with Susana HATESTHEWOLF for governor, you must remove her.
      If Or Brown or CA Brown will not act to help the wolf survive in numbers high enough to prevent trend to homozygosity (My call for this was finally echoed by Dr. Carlos Carroll in his critique of OR wolf delisting), demean that governeor in all ears that hear you, every chance you get.
      Guns, governors, cattlemen, commissioners – these are your targets. If you do not believe that you yourself have been the targets of the hate-filled psychos who pull triggers, poison (yes they do) and trap wolves, you are gravely mistaken. they demean and marginalize YOU every chance they get, from internet to personal conversation in bars, cars, and in their primitive writings.

      I have been around too many to misunderstand them .
      The other day I got an Alaskan to admit finally that without wolves, big bears, etc. that taking a stroll in wildlands is empty.
      Most pf you have not had the alternative experiences that we have, and I advise you to try and go for a few years to both kinds of places. I have always preferred the ones where the lion the bear the wolf walks – the others are too much like backyards ..
      Those cattlemen, those hunters, those republicans fear to tread in the real world, and want it to mimic their bathrooms in lack of wild life. Unless they back off, they cannot be tolerated on the earth.

      Like

  4. Tragically stupid and short sighted.

    Like

  5. Wolves are an important part of the ecosystem. Ranchers and hunters hate wolves. Fish and wildlife department cater to ranchers and hunters. Wolves die. The same sad play is enacted over and over, and it doesn’t seem to matter how unfair, how wrong, or how cruel that war is or how much we fight for them. The wolves die.

    Like

    • Why do they persist in catering to them? I just don’t understand it. I hope this is challenged in court, because the recovery plan was not completed (Phase III). Who keeps pushing for premature delistings, and why do the states keep falling like dominoes over it?

      Like

  6. Just added Oregon products to my Boycott List

    Like

  7. I called, the office is closed. I will again on Thru!.

    Like

    • isjustducky..it was a Federal holiday today so you should have better luck tomorrow.

      For the wolves, For the wild ones,
      Nabeki

      Like

  8. Something is horribly wrong in America. We desperately require having wildlife agencies that actually support the existences and safety of planet Earth’s strands in the web of all life. A century ago, Aldo Leopold eye-witnessed a section of planet Earth die without her wolves. Within this time frame, every one in America should grasp, the wolf is one of the most vital species on Earth as the wolf is the salvation of a vital evolutionary event that provided life as we know it — the salvation of Earth’s big green, trees and plants on the land’s surface.

    Dan Ashe, head honcho of U.S. wildlife service remarked, Americans going to have to get used to living with less wildlife. What he and countless wildlife agency honchos fail to recognize is, it is mankind and Earth that cannot survive without her wildlife. They desperately need to think like Earth. What is Earth’s opinion of her wolves?

    “Since then I have lived to see state after state extirpate its wolves. I have watched the face of many a newly wolf less mountain [metaphor for planet Earth] and seen the south facing slopes wrinkle with a maze of new deer trails. I have seen every edible bush and seedling browsed, first to anaemic desuetude and then to death. I have seen every edible tree defoliated to the height of a saddle horn. Such a mountain looks as if someone had given God a new pruning shears and forbidden Him all other exercise. In the end, the starved bones of the hoped for deer, dead of its “own too-much” bleach with the bones of the dead sage or molder under the high-lined junipers…

    Perhaps this is behind Thoreau’s dictum: In wildness is the salvation of the world. Perhaps this is the hidden meaning in the how of the wolf, long known among mountains but seldom perceived by men.”

    Like

  9. Time to boycott Oregon and their products, did the same to Idaho. One day these people will realize the wrong they’ve done. I hope it’s not too late for the next generation. The Governors of Oregon and Idaho have no common sense.

    Like

  10. I gave a bit to the kick starter for this wonderful film, and here it is. Pass the word……….The Medicine of Wolves.
    https://medicineofthewolf1.vhx.tv/packages/medicine-of-the-wolf-hd-digital-version-with-bonus-material/videos/medicine-of-the-wolf-vhx-1080p-h-264

    Like

  11. The film Medicine of the Wolf is out! I gave a bit to the kick starter and it was worth every penny.

    http://www.medicineofthewolf.com/

    Like

  12. Reblogged this on Sherlockian's Blog.

    Like


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: